Search results

administrative court where the address of the data subject is (Article 133 of the APC). This requires representation by a lawyer. The claim can be further brought

proceedings are under Art. 208 et seq. Of the Administrative Procedure Code (APC). It is initiated on a cassation appeal of the Regional Inspectorate for Environment

corresponding application of the order of Art. 204 et seq. of the APC in connection with Art. 144 of the APC referring to the CPC. A condition for eligibility is only

given the lack of negative prerequisites specified in Art. 27, para. 2 of the APC, at a meeting of the CPDP held on 09.10.2019, the appeal was accepted as procedurally

lawfulness laid down in Article 6 of the APC and the principle of transparency laid down in Articles 12 and 13 of the APC as a serious breach. In addition, there

original for more details. The proceedings are under Art. 208 et seq. of the APC. It was formed on the cassation appeal of "Speedy" AD against rejection decision

this sense, the usurper accessed the Client's private web area (hereinafter, APC) of the Claimant, subsequently initiating a conversation with the Digital

Act issued by the German authorities. On the basis of Article 26 of the APC, the company "D" was notified. AD with EIK-********, for the administrative

the absence of the negative prerequisites under Art. 27, paragraph 2 of the APC, at a meeting of the commission held on 20.07.2022, the complaint was accepted

83(2) GDPR Article 83(4)(b) GDPR Art. 208 Administrative Procedure Code (APC) Article 38(2) Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) Decided: Published: 04

basic principle in administrative proceedings, according to Art. 7 of the APC, requiring the existence of established actual facts and in view of the evidence

absence of the negative prerequisites under Article 27, paragraph 2 of the APC, at a meeting of the Commission held on 19.01.2022, the appeal was declared

Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (hereinafter the APC), is set out in an Annex. This annex is part of the judgment. Introduction

the alternative, [the applicant] invokes Article 17(1)(a) and (c) of the APC (the right to forgetting) with reference to the judgment of the Court of Justice